莫圖虛榮
文/唐牧
夜已深了。想起昨夜有個(gè)徳高望重的老師私下叮囑之言，有一番感慨共享。
昨晚，我發(fā)了個(gè)來(lái)自網(wǎng)上人點(diǎn)評(píng)莫言的看法，群里竟也有人看不慣，老師對(duì)我說(shuō)，群里也有人看不慣，希望少發(fā)有關(guān)莫言的鏈接。其實(shí)這些人都是戴著假面具偽裝文人的面孔，有著極強(qiáng)的妒忌和虛偽的燥熱心態(tài)，但這種心態(tài)，不應(yīng)該有。
我認(rèn)為這種人沒(méi)有資格看不慣莫言，更沒(méi)資格談?wù)撊ベH低莫言，你寫(xiě)了多少部長(zhǎng)篇巨著？得了多獎(jiǎng)？拍了電影電咧？人家莫言多次得獎(jiǎng)，長(zhǎng)篇巨著多部，拍了人人諧知的電視（電影）《紅高粱》，官方媒體也給予了肯定，國(guó)際獎(jiǎng)就不說(shuō)！你有什么資格評(píng)論莫言？！
建議這些人拿出多部長(zhǎng)篇巨著，才有資格對(duì)莫言的指三道四。
我雖然沒(méi)有什么寫(xiě)作水平，但有欣賞和閱讀能力，所以對(duì)任何作家的作品都感興趣。從法國(guó)莫泊桑的《羊脂球》、徳國(guó)的柏吉爾《琥珀》、到中國(guó)作家譚談老師的《山道彎彎》，他們對(duì)我酷愛(ài)文學(xué)影響很大。后來(lái)又讀了幾乎與我們同齡的莫言老師《紅高粱》，還有作家王蒙老師的意識(shí)流小說(shuō)《蝴蝶》……等等。70年代末“收獲”、“十月”、“當(dāng)代”非常有影響力雜志，我都喜歡訂購(gòu)收藏，只可惜家里烘暖一場(chǎng)大火全毀了，也廢了自己幾年心血的手稿。
不要借網(wǎng)絡(luò)在虛擬世界狂詡虛偽的自己，故弄玄虛沒(méi)有意義。也沒(méi)有擺臭架子資格，虛心向這些長(zhǎng)篇巨著作者學(xué)習(xí)。
說(shuō)句老實(shí)話，當(dāng)前網(wǎng)上諸微刊或?qū)嶓w雜志平臺(tái)，吸收了一些小詩(shī)或小散文，都不過(guò)是沽名釣譽(yù)，“滿足部分那些小打小鬧的人虛榮心”（某國(guó)家級(jí)作家的私話）網(wǎng)絡(luò)文學(xué)亂象充斥著，且省級(jí)以下的報(bào)紙小刊雷同塊頭版居多。許多憑關(guān)系弄到CN號(hào)的部分“名氣”作家為“顧問(wèn)”掛帥小刊電子版，部分是掛羊頭賣狗肉，不可入目。自媒體平臺(tái)更不用說(shuō)，口語(yǔ)化的、呆板抄襲洗稿成堆，一個(gè)小詩(shī)文的命題字?jǐn)?shù)，甚至占處百來(lái)字詩(shī)四分之一的篇幅，不會(huì)以詩(shī)言縮句命題，且題眼與正文意境不相切。尚有一定的閱讀和編審能力的老師干什么？何談鉛印成字的佳作吶？！
任何人，都有長(zhǎng)處和缺點(diǎn)，不要?jiǎng)硬粍?dòng)就以自己所謂身份或曾經(jīng)一度的光環(huán)“意氣用事”、“意氣風(fēng)發(fā)”，就狂言妒忌否定別人的成果，看不慣別人的一切？他山之石可以攻玉，也可以劃石來(lái)試金。
書(shū)山有路勤為徑，學(xué)海無(wú)涯苦作舟。欲知世事皆用腦，不識(shí)人情只觀花。這是如何做人的古訓(xùn)。我們共同勉勵(lì)吧。
做好自己的為人，莫圖虛榮。千萬(wàn)別像我一樣，胸沒(méi)多少文墨之心。
2022.08.07.晚：11：30
（唐牧英文編譯）
Motu vanity
Tang Mu
The night was deep. Remember last night there was a high look heavy teacher privately told the words, have some feelings to share.
Last night, I sent a comment from the Internet people Mo Yan view, the group was also someone can not stand, the teacher said to me, there are people in the group can't stand, hope less hair about the link of Mo yan. In fact, these people are wearing a mask to disguise the face of literati, with a strong jealousy and hypocritical hot mentality, but this mentality, should not have.
I think this kind of person is not qualified to see Mo Yan, but also no qualification to talk about to belittle Mo, you wrote how many long masterpiece? How many prizes? Did you make a movie? Mo Yan has won awards for many times. He has made the TV (film) "Red Sorghum" which everyone knows harmoniously. The official media has also given affirmation, but the international award will not be said! What qualifications do you have to comment?
I suggest that these people come up with many long-form masterpieces, only to be qualified to point to Mo Yan.
Although I don't have much writing ability, I have an appreciation and reading ability, so I am interested in the work of any writer. From Maupassant, France's "Boule de Suet," Germany's Bergier "Amber," to the Chinese writer Tan Tan teacher's "mountain road winding," they have a great impact on my love of literature. Later, I read Red Sorghum, a teacher of the same age as us, and the stream of consciousness novel Butterfly, a writer named Wang Meng. Wait a minute. In the late 1970s, "Harvest," "October," and "Contemporary" were very influential magazines. I like to subscribe and collect them. Unfortunately, the house was destroyed by a fire, and the manuscripts that I worked on for several years were also destroyed.
Do not borrow the network in the virtual world crazy Xu hypocrisy of their own, deliberately mystifying meaningless. Nor do I put on airs, humbly learn from these long-length magnum opus.
To be honest, the current online micro-magazine or entity magazine platform, absorbing some small poems or essays, They are just fishing for praise, "to meet the vanity of some of those who play small" (a national writer's private words) network literature chaos is full of, and the provincial newspapers below the small print version of the majority. Many of the "famous" writers who get the CN number by the relationship are "consultants" in charge of the electronic version of small journals, and some of them are not allowed to enter the eye. Not to mention from the media platform, colloquial, mechanical plagiarized manuscript piles, The number of words in a small poem, even accounting for a quarter of the length of the poem, will not be condensed in poetry, and the title is not tangent to the mood of the text. What do teachers who still have certain reading and editing skills do? What about the good print?
Anyone, have strengths and weaknesses, do not easily to their so-called identity or once the aura of "emotional," "high-spirited," on the wild talk jealous of the negative achievements of others, can not stand all others? The stones of the other mountains can be used to attack jade, but also to draw stones to test gold.
There is no royal road to learning. If you want to know the world, use your brain. This is how the old man taught. Let's pray together.
Do your own man, Mo Tu vanity. Do not be like me, chest not many words and ink heart.
Evening: 11: 30
